Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
en:praktikum:sternspektren [2018/11/20 13:32] – [N1 - Stellar spectra of different spectral types (DADOS)] rhainich | en:praktikum:sternspektren [2023/09/19 06:49] (current) – rhainich | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The scripts needed for the data reduction can be found on the [[en: | The scripts needed for the data reduction can be found on the [[en: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{section> | ||
==== Selection and inspection of the data ==== | ==== Selection and inspection of the data ==== | ||
- | The first tasks are to login to the [[en: | + | The first tasks are to login to the [[en: |
ds9 filename.fit | ds9 filename.fit | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
Now run the script by executing: | Now run the script by executing: | ||
- | ./1_findcaliblines.py | + | python |
Afterwards the following window will be displayed on the screen, showing the mercury and argon emission line spectrum. All lines that were identified by the script are highlighted by a red circle. Now, all lines with known wavelengths need to be marked. For this task, the above example spectrum can be very useful. The script runs through a list of predefined lines. The wavelength of the current line is displayed in the upper part of the window. The line corresponding to this wavelength can now easily marked by clicking into the corresponding red circle with the left mouse button. This circle should now appear blue and the corresponding wavelength is written next to the line peak (see below). If a wavelength is displayed that does not correspond to any of the highlighted lines, this wavelength can be skipped with a right click. At least four lines need to be marked to facilitate a successful wavelength calibration. If all useful lines are marked, this procedure can be completed by pressing the '' | Afterwards the following window will be displayed on the screen, showing the mercury and argon emission line spectrum. All lines that were identified by the script are highlighted by a red circle. Now, all lines with known wavelengths need to be marked. For this task, the above example spectrum can be very useful. The script runs through a list of predefined lines. The wavelength of the current line is displayed in the upper part of the window. The line corresponding to this wavelength can now easily marked by clicking into the corresponding red circle with the left mouse button. This circle should now appear blue and the corresponding wavelength is written next to the line peak (see below). If a wavelength is displayed that does not correspond to any of the highlighted lines, this wavelength can be skipped with a right click. At least four lines need to be marked to facilitate a successful wavelength calibration. If all useful lines are marked, this procedure can be completed by pressing the '' | ||
Line 190: | Line 192: | ||
Now run the script: | Now run the script: | ||
- | ./ | + | python 2_extractspectrum.py |
The following files are then created: | The following files are then created: | ||
Line 250: | Line 252: | ||
===== Report ===== | ===== Report ===== | ||
- | A usual report is to be handed in. It needs to describe the theoretical basics (spectral types & formation of stellar spectra & Doppler effect), identify distinctive spectral lines for each spectral type, and (shortly) describe and discuss the typical characteristics (i.e. the specific lines per spectral type) of each spectral type. Estimate the spectral type of the stars. Discuss your results and compare them to the known features for a certain spectral type from the literature. Address shortcomings in your results and discuss possible causes. **Please include all plots from the data reduction /* ,** including the plot for the spectral resolution and the original images showing the 2d spectra, ** */ in the appendix of your report**. /* For each star, the plot showing the spectra of the individual orders should be also attached to the report. Only the characteristic orders (individual panels from the masterplot) for each star should be included in the main part of the report.*/ | ||
- | /* | + | A usual report is to be handed in. See a general overview about the required structure |
- | After identifying the spectral type, the radial velocity of the star towards us should | + | |
- | */ | + | |
- | **Remark:** This [[http:// | + | For this experiment, the theoretical overview |
- | [[en: | + | In the methods section describe the observations and the data reduction, highlight points that deviate from general description in here and list all the parameters you set for the extraction. Further, include all the plots of the data reduction in the report (a few in the text, most of them in the appendix). |
- | /*A usual report has to be handed in. It needs to describe | + | The results part presents and describes |
- | **Remark:** This [[http:// | + | The analysis of the spectra contains the estimation of the spectral type for your target stars based on the characteristics that you have described in the theoretical background section. |
+ | |||
+ | Finally, discuss your findings. Bring your results into a larger context and make a literature comparison when possible. This also includes that you identify potential problems with the data, the data reduction, or the analysis and possible solutions for them. Are their inconsistencies? | ||
+ | |||
+ | //**Note:** This {{en: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [1] [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[en: | ||
- | [[en: | ||